Acceder

Kodak - Chapter 11: Quiebra

4,34K respuestas
Kodak - Chapter 11: Quiebra
Kodak - Chapter 11: Quiebra
Página
336 / 546
#2681

Re: Kodak - Chapter 11: Quiebra

Observando balance anual de kodak 2012
observaciones
efectivos y otros activos liquidos 1135 millones
por cobrar neto 865 millones
inventario 543 millones
otros activos circulantes
35 millones
suma 2578 millones pregunto cuanto hay por cobrar y cuanto hay en inventario ahora
ACTIVOS CORRIENTES
planta y equipos 693 millones(me imagino que son todas las plantas y inmuebles y maquinaria)
buena voluntad 278 millones (que es eso)
otros activos 737 millones
este rubro suma 1708 millones (prueba de mala valorizacion)
EXPLICO
ACTIVOS CORRIENTES VENDIDOS
1)La priemra venta fue de como 22 millones a stuffy era una divicion de archivo de fotos
2) vendio patentes por 527 millones
3) vendio la planta de generacion de energia en base a carbon por 10 millones
4)vendio a kpp su diviciones de scaner i otros por 2800 millones de su deuda mas 650 millones en efectivo sumando 3450 millones
Queda muy claro que activos corrientes en balance tenian 1708 millones pero hasta ahora han vendido por mas de 4000 millones.
y sigue kodak teniendo mas activos
patentes
inmuebles mas de 300 edificios
la marca
maquinaria
vehiculos
sin considerar filiales
ESTO DEMUESTRA QUE ES NECESARIO UN COMITE DE EQUIDAD
esto debemos difundirlo en redes sociales en otros blog
y poner fuerza
TOTAL DE PASIVO
7965 MILLONES
DIFERENCIA
activos vs pasivos 3679 millones
pregunto no se ha vendido activos corrientes por 4000 millones cuya valorizacion estava en 1708 millones(diferencia 2292 milllones)
aplicando la diferencia entre pasivo y activos de 3679 millones restando la diferencia en valorizacion de 2292 nos da 1387 millones negativo de activois vs pasivos

Pero eso fuera si ya no tuvieramos activos ta que considere el total de activos corrientes.
ACASO NO QUEDAN
1)inmuebls
patentes
la marca kodak
filiales no consideradas en chapter 11 pero propiedad de kodak
empresas mixtas
y alguien puede creer que 300 edificios 20,000 patentes filiales(efectivo nada mas 1300 de las filiales) no permiten cubrir esos 1327 de diferencial
no se trata de pagar toda la deuda si no garantizar su pago.
una vez fuera del cahapter kodak cpon compromiso de pagar aacreedores la accion subiria y podriian haser una dilucion y pagar toda su deudas de esa manera garantizar el pago

#2682

Re: Kodak - Chapter 11: Quiebra

como la ven la accion para el lunes y la senmana despues del escandalo de colucion

#2683

Re: Kodak - Chapter 11: Quiebra

Pues la veo igual que el ultimo mes,plana y sin volumen

#2684

Re: Kodak - Chapter 11: Quiebra

Increíble la capacidad de prospectiva, o artes adivinatorias, de la gente de El Boletín:

Los foreros han comenzado la jornada del martes debatiendo sobre su interés por empresas internacionales como Kodak, que sigue con una crisis cada vez mayor. Desde rankia.com, aseguran que la quiebra de esta empresa de fotografía hace que no sean suficientes las reuniones que están manteniendo para pedir préstamos y conseguir pagar a los acreedores.
Debemos ser tan previsibles que ya se sabe que mañana hablaremos en este hilo sobre la insuficiencia de las reuniones para pedir préstamos y pagar a los acreedores. La ostia.
#2685

Re: Kodak - Chapter 11: Quiebra

estoy investigando ya tengo la razon por que no dan comite de equidad observen estos enlases
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/07/18/us-privateequity-collusion-lawsuit-idUSBRE96H15A20130718
Si ven esta noticia reuters involucra a empresa que quieren apoderarse de kodak y kv pharma
que coincidencia mismo mecanismo mismos heldge found pero la coincidencia es mayor.
en la lista deempresa que se apoderaron encuentro CINES AMC(CINEPLEX)
asdivinen quien fue el juez del chapter 11 espero que haya adivinado si no observen
http://articles.latimes.com/2002/mar/01/business/fi-cotown1.2
OBSERVEN EL TEXTO

Loews Cineplex Recovery Plan Wins Judge's OK

IN BRIEF / Entertainment

March 01, 2002|Bloomberg News

Email

Share

Loews Cineplex Entertainment Corp. won a judge's approval of a Chapter 11 recovery plan that allows the theater chain to satisfy creditors and come out of bankruptcy under new ownership.

Under the reorganization plan approved by U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Allan Gropper in Manhattan, Onex Corp. and Oaktree Capital Management will assume control of New York-based Loews Cineplex. Together, they hold about a third of Loews' $1.5-billion debt.

#2686

Re: Kodak - Chapter 11: Quiebra

otra prueba mas
http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2010/05/07/general-growth-picks-brookfield-plan-over-simons/
no se ingles pero miren

General Growth Picks Brookfield Plan Over Simon’s

By MICHAEL J. DE LA MERCED

Article Tools

Facebook
Twitter
Google+
E-mail
Share
Print
.


3:35 p.m. | Updated A federal bankruptcy judge granted General Growth Properties’ motion to certify an investment plan led by Brookfield Asset Management as its “stalking-horse” bid. Minutes later, the Simon Property Group said it was withdrawing its $20-a-share bid.

10:47 a.m. | Updated: General Growth Properties, the bankrupt mall operator, has chosen to stick with an investment plan led by Brookfield Asset Management, spurning a last-minute takeover bid from the Simon Property Group.

Lawyers for General Growth are asking a federal bankruptcy judge in a hearing on Friday to grant Brookfield’s plan “stalking horse” status, meaning that it would set the baseline for competing bids. It would also begin the issuance of millions of warrants to the Brookfield plan’s sponsors.

Simon said Thursday night that it would withdraw its “best and final” takeover plan, which carries a $33.5 billion enterprise value, should the warrants be issued under the Brookfield plan. Simon has argued that the warrants are costly and unnecessary, and would make it costlier to compete against the Brookfield proposal.

A lawyer for Simon, David Katz, at Friday’s hearing asked for a one-day adjournment of the proceedings to work out a potential compromise with General Growth. If the judge, Allan Gropper, granted the Brookfield plan stalking horse status, Mr. Katz reiterated, his client would walk away.

But General Growth said that it still believed the warrants represented a small obstacle to other suitors and that certifying the Brookfield plan as the stalking horse would ensure at least one certain path to emerging from bankruptcy.

“General Growth believes that obtaining the certainty is worth the cost of the warrants,” Marcia Goldstein, a lawyer for General Growth, said at the hearing.

Ms. Goldstein said that the General Growth board had met twice on Thursday after receiving Simon’s latest proposal, and still decided that pursuing the Brookfield plan was the best course. The company remained open to alternative bids, she added.

Lawyers for General Growth’s unsecured creditors committee and equity committee said they backed granting the Brookfield plan stalking horse status. The creditors’ committee withdrew an objection to the company’s motion after being assured that the Brookfield proposal had enough financial support to pay off General Growth’s $7 billion in unsecured debt in full and in cash. (It had initially backed Simon’s original takeover bid.)

Both Simon and Brookfield are competing to win over General Growth as it seeks to emerge from a year-long Chapter 11 case, one of the largest involving a real estate company. So far, General Growth has consistently favored the Brookfield plan, though in recent days it has engaged Simon in talks over a potential merger.

Under the terms of its new plan, Simon would pay $20 a share in cash and stock for General Growth’s equity, or about $6.5 billion, as well as pay off its rival’s $7 billion in unsecured debt and take over about $20 billion in outstanding mortgages. It has partnered with the Blackstone Group.

The Brookfield plan, which is also sponsored by Fairholme Capital Management and Pershing Square Capital Management, would split General Growth into a bigger company holding most of its malls and a smaller one that would hold properties the company views as undervalued. Brookfield and its partners would invest in the larger entity at $10 a share and the smaller one at $5 a share.

Simon said it would be willing to offer a recapitalization plan similar to Brookfield’s if its takeover plan ran into antitrust problems, a possibility General Growth has raised. But Simon’s backup offer would invest $11 a share in the larger General Growth spinoff.

resalto estos parrafos
lawyer for Simon, David Katz, at Friday’s hearing asked for a one-day adjournment of the proceedings to work out a potential compromise with General Growth. If the judge, Allan Gropper, granted the Brookfield plan stalking horse status, Mr. Katz reiterated, his client would walk away
vemos quien es el juez
Under the terms of its new plan, Simon would pay $20 a share in cash and stock for General Growth’s equity, or about $6.5 billion, as well as pay off its rival’s $7 billion in unsecured debt and take over about $20 billion in outstanding mortgages. It has partnered with the Blackstone Group.
vemos a un hedge funds del caso kodak

#2687

Re: Kodak - Chapter 11: Quiebra

No termino de entenderlo Ricardo.

#2688

Re: Kodak - Chapter 11: Quiebra

que no entiendes amigo.
le acabo de pedir a la sec para crear comite de equidad yq que hay indicios que aparentan una colucion y or el buen nombre de todos es necesario crear dicho comite para evitar suspicacias muchas cn fundamento

Te puede interesar...
  1. Primeras dudas sobre la 'Trumponomics', ¿corrección o toma de beneficios?
  2. Nvidia bate expectativas pero decepciona. Insiders reafirman su posición