Acceder

Washington Mutual demanda a la FDIC por 17 billones US$ + daños

26,5K respuestas
Washington Mutual demanda a la FDIC por 17 billones US$ + daños
3 suscriptores
Washington Mutual demanda a la FDIC por 17 billones US$ + daños
Página
2.876 / 3.346
#23001

Re: solicitud de AYUDA a Mr Simpson y cualquier otra persona que me pueda ayudar

Muchas gracias Adruna por tu ayuda

#23002

Re: Ballots a Selfbank

MR SIMPSON una consulta

Tu enviaste llenos los documentos que te enviaron por correo electrónico o recibiste los originales los completaste y los devolviste unavez completados

#23003

Re: Washington Mutual demanda a la FDIC por 17 billones US$ + daños

Gran volumen de las H´s y manteniendo el precio, aprende Simpson.

#23004

Re: Washington Mutual demanda a la FDIC por 17 billones US$ + daños

Tan listo que eres... te has perdido una subida del 22% en WAMPQ

"Like it or not, we are moving closer to POR 7 approval and that means the market is less uncertain about the outcome which is going to be much better than what is reflected in the pps right now given that JPM has stolen most of what is owed to us, but the crumb that it left is still better than what the stock is trading at.

Another thing is that people are buyng ahead of sending out their release which will lock up the stock"

"Suppose there is a fix value of new co, not including the NOLs and suppose that figure is $8 a share on the Ps. As prices goes up, it becomes more expensive against the risk and as prices go down, the risk become less and less.
When the price of P was $15 against the $8 value, the differences of $7 for an unknown amount of NOLs that can be utilized is higher, but when the price drop to $10, the risk is only $2 (since there will be $8 value). Since it is unlikely that none of the NOLs is utilized, the risk is even lower. Therefore, as prices drop, so the possible gain make this a real attractive investment.

Example, you are in the business of selling orange. When the oranges are $1 each and you can sell them for $1.50, the risk is high because if you can't sell the orange, it will go bad. So you decide is a bad business to start. Suppose you can get the orange for $0.50? Will you do it? The initial investment is now $0.5 but the gain will be $1.00. Chances are some orange will be sold, so you will only not lose any money if you sell only 1/2 of the orange. Buying two cost $1.00 and selling only one will get you even. The lowering of the prices make WMI a almost risk free with great upside, why not? In the previous deal, $2 get two orange and selling 1/2 (one orange) will be a net loser, where as when the prices are lower, you will be a winner, which do you prefer? These are all basic stuff, but I expect a ton of buys if the prices drop any lower."

#23005

Re: Washington Mutual demanda a la FDIC por 17 billones US$ + daños

Simpson habiendo bajado las P´s desde los 40 cuando debias vender progresivamente, incluso como menos en los 30, resulta que despues de llegar a 9 vienes a dar lecciones de trading, Jajaja, continua con tus largos, que los que las compraron a 80 les gustaria que les dieras una explicacion sobre comprar y mantener, no para hacerse millonarios pero al menos que recuperen el capital inicial.

Despues de leer uno de tantos post BOMBEADORES con información manipulada que posteas, solo te falta colocar tu epitafio preferido, por el cual muchos quedaron pillados especialmente en 2010:

para que compreis todas las WAMUQ y WAMPQ que podais.
Es la oportunidad del siglo !!!!

#23006

Re: Washington Mutual demanda a la FDIC por 17 billones US$ + daños

Os pido opinión de voto para las Wahuq, segun la documentación enviada por Selfbank, las opciones son las siguientes:
OPTIONS
Option 1:
Holders who Reject the Plan and Opt Out and will not be entitled to any distribution. Shares will be cancelled.
Option 2:
Holders who Accept the Plan and Opt Out and will not be entitled to any distribution. Shares will be cancelled.
Option 3:
Holders who Accept or Reject the Plan and Grant the Release will be eligible to receive a prorated distribution of Runoff
Notes, Creditor Cash and Liquidating Trust Interest.
Option 4:
Security
Holders who Accept or Reject the Plan and Grant the Release may elect to receive pro rata share of Common Stock
Allotment, in lieu of (i) 50% of such holderks Litigation Proceeds Interest and (ii) some or all of the Runoff Notees that the
holders is otherwise entitled to receive.

Entiendo que la mejor opción es la 3 o la 4, alguien me puede dar su opinión de cual sería mejor??
Muchas gracias

#23007

Re: Washington Mutual demanda a la FDIC por 17 billones US$ + daños

Yo he optado por la 3, porque la 4 ni la acabo de entender ni los servicios jurídicos supieron explicarme a que exponia la opcion 4 que vincula a las acciones comunes., aunque no estaría de más que te dieran una explicacion sobre que diferencia la 3 y la 4 para asegurarte, después de votado ya no hay marcha atras.