Washington Mutual demanda a la FDIC por 17 billones US$ + daños

COMO COÑO SE NOS NIEGA EL DERECHO A LA DEFENSA,NO HAY LEYES EN EEUU???DE VERGUENZA

Escucha el audio que puse de la audiencia entre el minuto 15-16min, esa fue la gran intervención de Susman y la mofa de la juez junto al unísono de las risas de Weil.

Repecto a tus preguntas tensi, ni idea, tratemos entre todos de hacer dd y conseguimos entre todos encontrar que posiblidades tiene Susman de parar un claro acuerdo que va a producirse entre fdic/jpm/wmi y que la juez es proclive a firmar, de hecho el aplazamiento del DS y lo veo como una medida de darle más tiempo a Rosen, de hecho fue Rosen el que solicito insistentemente más tiempo ya que estaba apunto de alanzar el acuerdo aseguró.

Saludos

Pero que esto es lo típico en las bk chapter 11, yo lo estoy viendo muy parecido a todas las que he seguido con cierto detalle. Partes se reparten el botin, ejecutivos de la empresa corruptos y la juez que no busca justicia, si no escurrir el bulto.

Ahorma mismo nuestros grandes aliados son Mike el presidente del EC que parece ser un tio curtido en esto de los chapter 11 y que se conocerá todas las jugadas y Susman.

Saludos

Aunque no venga al caso para ver con que tipo de bandidos nos la estamos jugando con toda esta mafia del sector financiero, os dejo este post con una articulo de rankia y comentarios que me han parecido algunos muy muy interesaantes sobre todo los primeros.

https://www.rankia.com/blog/nuevasreglaseconomia/490232-zapatero-rajoy-acuerdo-ayudar-bancos#comentario_490287

http://www.ghostofwamu.com/documents/09-00615/09-00615-0045.pdf

1. On April 19,2010, the Court entered an order (the "Stay Order") approving the
Stipulation to Stay of Appeals (the "Stipulation") pursuant to which Washington Mutual, Inc.
and WMI Investment Corp. (together, the "Debtors"), the Official Committee of Unsecured
Creditors of Washington Mutual, Inc., et al. (the "Creditors' Committee"), the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation, as receiver for Washington Mutual Bank (the "FDIC-Receiver"), and
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association ("JPMC," and collectively, with the Debtors, the
Creditors' Committee, and the FDIC, the "Parties") agreed to stay all of the above-captioned
proceedings before this Court for thirty (30) days from the date of the StipUlation.
2. In the Stay Order, the Court ordered that the Parties are to report to the Court in
writing on the status of this matter prior to the expiration on the thirty-day stay approved by the
Court.
3. As indicated in the Stipulation, on March 12, 2010, the counsel to the Debtors
announced on the record before the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the
"Bankruptcy Court") that they had reached an understanding with the other Parties, subject to
definitive documentation and other conditions, that would potentially resolve all of their
disputes, including the above-referenced proceedings before this Court.
4. Subsequently, on March 26,2010, the Debtors filed their Joint Plan of Affiliated
Debtors Pursuant to Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code, as amended (the "Plan"),
and the disclosure statement related thereto (the "Disclosure Statement"). On May 17,2019, the
Debtors filed an Amended Plan (the "Amended Plan") and an Amended Disclosure Statement
(the "Amended Disclosure Statement").
5. Both the Plan and Amended Plan incorporate a proposed global settlement
agreement among the Parties.
{683.00I-W0007863. } 2
6. The Parties' settlement negotiations are continuing, and the Parties remain hopeful
that a definitive settlement agreement will be achieved and the required conditions, including
approval of such a definitive settlement agreement by the Parties' respective boards of directors
and by the Bankruptcy Court, will be satisfied, but at this time the Parties cannot provide
absolute assurances that those discussions will result in a definitive settlement.
7. The Bankruptcy Court has scheduled a hearing on June 3, 2010 with respect to the
Amended Disclosure Statement. The Debtors intend to seek Bankruptcy Court-approval of the
Disclosure Statement at that hearing and are currently targeting July 20, 2010 for a hearing to
consider Bankruptcy Court-approval of the Amended Plan. The Debtors contemplate seeking
approval of the proposed settlement in connection with confirmation of the Plan.
8. In view of the foregoing, the Parties respectfully request that the Court continue to
stay all of the above-captioned proceedings for an additional thirty days to allow the Parties
additional time to work toward Plan-confirmation and potential resolution of all the underlying
disputes between the Parties. The Parties agree to report in writing on the status of these matters
prior to the expiration of the stay. In the event that the Parties are unable to reach agreement on
the proposed settlement, JPMC and the FDIC-Receiver intend to request prompt adjudication of
these matters.

Aparte de Susman y Hammer has de sumar a los abogados de las preferentes que parece ser son de primera linea. Tal como comentas en tipicos casos de Chapter los bonistas y acreedores suelen quedarse las empresas pero aqui con el tema de los NOL repartidos para descuadrar las cuentas la han cagado, no creo que ni la FDIC entre en este juego, ya que luego aun quedaran con el culo al aire para ser nuevamente demandados.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hSJsWmhbZyLfejIucjKC1lyur7WQD9FQ735O2

Otro palo hoy para las comunes???