Acceder

Washington Mutual demanda a la FDIC por 17 billones US$ + daños

26,5K respuestas
Washington Mutual demanda a la FDIC por 17 billones US$ + daños
3 suscriptores
Washington Mutual demanda a la FDIC por 17 billones US$ + daños
Página
2.777 / 3.346
#22209

Re: Esperando a Susman...

Porque yo estoy dando una opinión... Mi opinión. No tengo ni la verdad absoluta ni la poseo. Transmito lo que deseo que ocurra creo que ya es hora de que te hayas dado cuenta. Para cuestionar mis motivos ya os tengo a vosotros... :) :) :)

#22211

Re: Washington Mutual demanda a la FDIC por 17 billones US$ + daños

Si se consiguen parte de las reclamaciones que publica el periodista los accionistas pueden salir mejor parados que recibir una miseria pero siendo un juicio cualquiera se fía, no??

Se le ve bastante optimista y entendido en la materia y dice que es mucho de WAMKQ.

#22212

Litigation: Here we go

Here is the current pacer list as of 4:21 pm:

09/27/2011 8664 Supplemental Affidavit/Declaration of Service of Carlos I. Lara (related document(s) 8587 , 8588 , 8590 ) Filed by Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC. (Scott, Jason) (Entered: 09/27/2011)

09/27/2011 8665 Reservation of Rights Relating to Objection of Stephen J. Rotella to the Modified Sixth Amended Join Plan of Affiliated Debtors (Related to Docket Nos. 6696[RECAP] 7473 8612 8613 ) Filed by Stephen J. Rotella. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service) (Wisler, Jeffrey) (Entered: 09/27/2011)

09/27/2011 8666 Monthly Application for Compensation of Peter J. Solomon Company (Eighteenth) for the period July 1, 2011 to July 31, 2011 Filed by Official Committee of Equity Holders. Objections due by 10/17/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Notice # 2 Exhibit A# 3 Exhibit B# 4
Certificate of Service) (Taylor, Gregory) (Entered: 09/27/2011)

09/27/2011 8667 Monthly Application for Compensation of BDO USA, LLP (First Consolidated) for the period April 18, 2011 to August 31, 2011 Filed by Official Committee of Equity Holders. Objections due by 10/17/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Notice # 2 Exhibits A through C# 3 Declaration # 4 Certificate of Service) (Taylor, Gregory) (Entered: 09/27/2011)

09/27/2011 8668 Certificate of No Objection Regarding Seventeenth Monthly Application for Compensation of Ashby & Geddes, P.A. for the Period July 1, 2011 through July 31, 2011 (related document(s) 8569 ) Filed by Official Committee of Equity Holders. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service) (Taylor, Gregory) (Entered: 09/27/2011)

09/27/2011 8669 Monthly Application for Compensation of Ashby & Geddes, P.A. (Eighteenth) for the period August 1, 2011 to August 31, 2011 Filed by Official Committee of Equity Holders. Objections due by 10/17/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Notice # 2 Exhibit A# 3 Certificate of Service) (Taylor, Gregory) (Entered: 09/27/2011)

09/27/2011 8670 Notice of Appeal . Fee Amount $255. (related document(s) 8613 ) Filed by Aurelius Capital Management, LP. Appellant Designation due by 10/11/2011. (Debaecke, Michael) (Entered: 09/27/2011)

09/27/2011 8671 Notice of Appeal . Fee Amount $255. (related document(s) 8613 ) Filed by Normandy Hill Capital L.P.. Appellant Designation due by 10/11/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A) (Horan, Thomas) (Entered: 09/27/2011)

09/27/2011 8672 Motion for Leave to Appeal (related document(s) 8670 ) Filed by Aurelius Capital Management, LP. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A# 2 Exhibit B-1# 3 Exhibit B-2# 4 Exhibit B-3# 5 Exhibit C# 6 Exhibit D# 7 Exhibit E# 8 Exhibit F# (9) Exhibit G# 10 Exhibit H# 11 Exhibit I# 12 Exhibit J# 13 Exhibit K) (Debaecke, Michael) (Entered: 09/27/2011)

09/27/2011 8673 Notice of Appeal . Fee Amount $255. (related document(s) 8613 ) Filed by Appaloosa Management, L.P., Centerbridge Partners, L.P., Owl Creek Asset Management LP. Appellant Designation due by 10/11/2011. (Debaecke, Michael) (Entered: 09/27/2011)

09/27/2011 8674 Motion for Leave to Appeal (related document(s) 8673 ) Filed by Appaloosa Management, L.P., Centerbridge Partners, L.P., Owl Creek Asset Management LP. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A# 2 Exhibit B# 3 Proposed Form of Order) (Debaecke, Michael) (Entered: 09/27/2011)

09/27/2011 8675 Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Leave to Appeal From the Decision of the Bankruptcy Court or, Alternatively, for Issuance of a Writ of Mandamus (related document(s) 8674 ) Filed by Appaloosa Management, L.P., Centerbridge Partners, L.P., Owl Creek Asset Management LP. (Debaecke, Michael) (Entered: 09/27/2011)

#22214

Bopfan / 9 meses - 2-3 años mas.

Equity's Status as Residuary and JPM's Claim

Plan v. 6 has been rejected -- twice. However certain facts have to be faced, one of which is that equity has only a residual interest in the assets of WMI. What that means is that only after WMI's creditors' claims have been satisfied can equity get a distribution.

If a plan is proposed that does not include the GSA then JPM will simply reassert its claim for $54B. According to p. 26 of the court's recent opinion the EC will NOT be able to challenge the validity of that claim because it enjoys the protection of the court's ruling that the GSA settling it is 'law of the case'. That $54B will extinguish any possibility of equity having control over the case or obtaining any recovery. Judge Walrath gave the EC a Hobson's choice: (1) accept the GSA; or (2) the $54B will be imposed.

Again (and hopefully for the last time), the GSA could be undone if we get to Judge Sleet before the EC has to make the Hobson's choice, and Judge Sleet rules against the GSA. It is theoretically possible that we can get an expedited hearing, but usually it takes 2-3 years for a bankruptcy appeal to be resolved in DE District Court and we're only about 9 months into the appeal cycle. Those are the facts.

#22215

Re: Bopfan / 9 meses - 2-3 años mas.

Eso son los hechos y ahora que cada uno dictamine lo que le diga su conciencia.

#22216

GSA Does Not Stand, Sleet Rules

That is where this is going unless JPM concedes. The $54B claim by JPM is outrageous, what balls, they receive $180B in deposits that have earned them $2B a quarter, + another $100B in assets, and the government gave them TARP to cover the $19B in toxic mortgages it inherited - which JPM paid back in full in 2010.

Plus, Washington Mutuals assets contribute 27% to JPM's bottom line, and that number is in a bad economy. JPM is poised to rule the banking industry because it owns the NE, MW, and now a big contender in the NW and S from Washington Mutual assets.

And they have the ballz to have a $54B claim? For what, for the money they should have paid WM when the bank was solvent and seeking a buyer bc of all the shananigans of insider trading?

Sleet will cancel the GSA, and equity will be paid in my honest opinion folks...

:) :) :) el comentario es una opinión vertida por su autor Germanosteve. Esperemos que se cumpla.

Te puede interesar...
  1. Primeras dudas sobre la 'Trumponomics', ¿corrección o toma de beneficios?
  2. Nvidia bate expectativas pero decepciona. Insiders reafirman su posición