Soy consciente Helm. Te doy algunos datos,
-Exposición actual a RV es del 40%
-Lleva un 9,20% anualizado con una volatilidad a 3 AÑOS del 5,44%
-Este año lleva un 2,9, algo mas que el 0,01% no crees? XD
Y todo esto con un Rating Portfolio de AAA.
Ademas les escribí a la gestora pregutandoles el porqué de la bajada y esto me contestaron,
"Currently the exposure is 20%, which is rather extraordinary, as usually we have an exposure of 0% or 40%. There was a discretionary intervention to reduce the equity overlay by half due to the market turmoil, otherwise the current exposure would be 40% following our quantitative models.
I can briefly explain the current standing of the fund. As usually stock markets rise and bond markets fall when the economy is strong and vice versa, the aim of the fund is to adopt the business cycle and to be invested in the currently favorable market. However, sometimes markets do not behave logically in terms of the economy theorem and both markets rise or fall at the same time, which happened in June. Of course, quantitative models do react with a certain delay only, thus, the fund BOL also suffered from this situation. However, the management method of Bantleon Opportunities L (BOL) had been able to substantially absorb the impact of the market turmoil on the fund, but could not prevent it completely. Of course it is important to emphasize, that the equity market trends sideward since May meanwhile the yields hiked strongly. Hence there was no alpha source at hand helping the fund to recover from its losses."
No quiero ser yo aquí el defensor a ultranza de este fondo, de hecho yo me salí y me quedé con el Optimal Income, pero no descarto volver a entrar.