Fraude en chapter kodak

no se ingles por eso publique en español

lo puse en el pais de españa online

No se entiende muy bien lo que pones en español Ricardo... pero algo asi diria en ingles, espero te sirva...

¿Why the SEC does not investigate the process of Chapter 11 bankruptcy Eastman Kodak Company? As there are too many irregularities and no respect for the old shareholders, in addition to the fundamental rights of defense were violated by denying the equity committee.

Find out where are the assets, the valuation of the huge Kodak 's patent portfolio, taking into account the appreciation of Rochester Kodak industrial park with more than 12,000 acres and 150 buildings with laboratories.

Subsidiaries outside of the U.S. were not part of the Chapter 11 bankruptcy process , and the subsidiaries were sold in confidentiality with Judge, plus it was not his jurisdiction.

There is corruption in the process because they will only pay a portion of the creditors and directors of Kodak, leaving defenseless to the former shareholders.

The Audit and Finance Director of Kodak is the director of Blackstone, main beneficiary when received $ 528 million for patents photography.

It first had to pay creditors in possession and not to bonds maturing from 2018 to 2023.

The SEC has done nothing to protect shareholders from abuse by so many anomalies and we demand to take up the matter and do your duty. This would generate a complete distrust in the system if you do not take the proper actions.

gracias me sirve la traduccion mas tarde lo pegare en muros de cnn sec departamentod e justicia
y otros haydemaciada evidencia de fraude paraperder un proceso quisas un estudio de abogados quiera interesarse en le tema
yoestoy seguro que si ex accionsitas nos juntamos ganaremos yrecueraremos la propiedad de kodak

ya publique en cnn/sec/departamento de justicia/bloomberg/fbi/ new york times/
sobre post 187

esta semana la corte estara poco movida

HOME
SPORTS
LIFE
BUSINESS
FLAVORS
OPINION
HER
ROCDOCS
ROCROOTS
MEDIA
FIREFLY
SEARCH
8
6

Kodak spinoffs in legal battle
Matthew Daneman, Staff writer 6:04 p.m. EDT May 19, 2014
164034593.jpg
(Photo: Getty Images )
8
CONNECT
TWEET
6
LINKEDIN
COMMENT
EMAIL
MORE
We may live in a digital age, but online is not always the best place to store every piece of information.

Numerous publishers, libraries, museums and corporations keep archives on microfilm or microfiche. And a pair of Eastman Kodak Co. spinoffs are battling each in the business world — and in court — over a slice of that market.

Dallas-headquartered Eastman Park Micrographics Inc. is suing Kodak Alaris Inc. in state Supreme Court, alleging that Alaris is trying to pilfer EPM's customers in violation of an agreement between the two companies. EPM contracts with Alaris to provide the engineers needed to maintain and support its equipment in the United States and Canada.

The suit was filed last week in state Supreme Court in Monroe County — just days after Alaris bought EPM's business servicing equipment in Europe, Asia and Latin America. Financial details of that deal, which was effective April 30, were not made public. The two companies, in announcing the deal, said Alaris will continue to distribute EPM equipment and supplies in those markets.

Kodak sold its microfilm and microfiche business in 2011 to EPM, a company founded by former Kodak executive William Oates. While based in Dallas, EPM also operates out of Eastman Business Park. Alaris is headquartered in the United Kingdom, but its principal location is also at Eastman Business Park.

Kodak continued to provide maintenance and support of equipment to EPM after the 2011 sale. And when Kodak's Document Imaging and Personalized Imaging businesses were sold in 2013, forming Kodak Alaris, Alaris then picked up the EPM service work.

But according to the suit, when EPM indicated to Alaris in December that it intended to end that service provider agreement in May 2014, Alaris began using confidential information to begin soliciting those customers, offering them deep discounts to jump ship. As part of the suit, EPM included Alaris brochures "that not only overtly solicit those customers but also disparage EPM's ability to service those customers' micrographics equipment," the suit states.

EPM is seeking damages of upward of $1 million, plus a permanent injunction banning any further customer solicitation.

Alaris did not respond to a message seeking comment Monday.

[email protected]

17 de junio 2014 14:29:13: Kodak demanda a Trustee Altek Corp. recuperar 49,2 millones de dólares - el Capítulo 11 de bancarrota - Resultados Yahoo Noticias Buscar
El síndico designado en Eastman Kodak Co. (KODK) 's quiebra presentado una demanda para recuperar los pagos de alrededor de $ 49.200.000 que se hicieron para Altek Corp. (3059) en los 90 días anteriores al Capítulo 11 de la fotografía de pionero.