Washington Mutual demanda a la FDIC por 17 billones US$ + daños

Vaya caña le estan dando a las comunes, veo que estan vendiendo mucho por debajo de 0.11

Ah si???pues hay que aclararlo esto,es un extremo importante,de todas formas lo habra dicho muy rapido porque el mercado no se ha enterado

No me jodas, ten si, yo también estoy tramando algo y mi abuela, siempre hay ponerse en la situación del contrario. Si tu fueras Rosen se podría decir que lo estás haciendo de puta madre y todo lo que quieres lo vas consiguiendo sólo le faltaban los bonistas y la fdic y lo tiene en el bote, no les pasa ni dos folios con información al Ec y la juez no le dice nada, pone una moción en contra del examinador y se la conceden, ... Vamos a centrarnos un poco y ponernos en la situación del adversario.

Saludos

Si si ves el proceder de toddos los sujetos en este cao y ves coo los nuestros se van quedando sin argumentos hasta perecer,con la complacencia de la juez si ni siquiera poder exponer sus argumentos los nuestros,lamentable me extraña que un tipo como tu con cabeza no haya vendido.

J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. is abandoning its demand for a $1.4 billion tax break in exchange for a bigger upfront share of a Washington Mutual Inc. bankruptcy settlement, according to people close to the situation.

Ever since Washington Mutual was seized by regulators in September 2008, J.P. Morgan, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. and Washington Mutual's bankrupt parent company have been tussling over billions in deposits, pension benefits and tax refunds tied to Washington Mutual. J.P. Morgan paid $1.9 billion for the thrift's banking assets and deposits.

Hace 2 semanas vendi todas las comunes, hace 1 todas las preferentes y las meti en más h's a 20$, simplemente especule con cierto beneficio de las h's en 100000 comunes compradas ayer alrededor de 0,12. Pero bueno ya vemos que todos los dias D con zanahoria ya no es que la zanahoria la pasen de fecha si no es que nos la clavan por donde amargan los...

J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. is abandoning its demand for a $1.4 billion tax break in exchange for a bigger upfront share of a Washington Mutual Inc. bankruptcy settlement, according to people close to the situation.

Ever since Washington Mutual was seized by regulators in September 2008, J.P. Morgan, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. and Washington Mutual's bankrupt parent company have been tussling over billions in deposits, pension benefits and tax refunds tied to Washington Mutual. J.P. Morgan paid $1.9 billion for the thrift's banking assets and deposits.

J.P. Morgan hopes that its concession may break the stalemate and bring the parties closer to an agreement, which could happen as early as this week. The proposal would deliver as much $6.4 billion in Washington Mutual assets to the New York bank, up from about $6.1 billion under a prior proposal. What it agreed to give up for the sweetened settlement proposal, people familiar with the situation said, is the potential for as much as $1.4 billion in federal tax refunds made possible by a provision in the 2009 economic-stimulus bill.

This proposal, however, doesn't have the approval of certain parties involved in the Washington Mutual case, including the FDIC and bank bondholders. The FDIC told a U.S. Bankruptcy Court judge Wednesday that the new terms "positively address the concerns" of the FDIC receiver.

J.P. Morgan declined to comment.

The 2009 stimulus bill allowed companies to apply losses from 2008 and 2009 against any taxes paid in the previous five years. Washington Mutual was eligible for as much as $2.8 billion under the law. J.P. Morgan originally said it should be allowed to claim all refunds because it had agreed to purchase Washington Mutual's assets.

But the bill specifically excluded any companies that received bank-bailout aid from getting the tax refunds. J.P. Morgan received $25 billion in 2008. The Wall Street bank had argued to other parties in the case that the bailout ban wouldn't apply because Washington Mutual, and not J.P. Morgan, was the taxpayer. The bank also argued the refund wouldn't go to the bank directly, instead it would be held by the FDIC in receivership and J.P. Morgan could access the funds if sued over Washington Mutual-related issues.

Washington Mutual bank bondholders and the FDIC balked at J.P. Morgan's potential stimulus benefit.

If the latest proposal is approved, J.P. Morgan wouldn't be able to tap the FDIC receiver for refund money in the event of a lawsuit. But it would get about $300 million more from a separate pool of refunds originally reserved for creditors and not tied to the 2009 stimulus bill, giving it a total of $6.4 billion in Washington Mutual assets.

Also, J.P. Morgan still has the ability to ask the corporate arm of the FDIC to cover as much as $500 million in future legal claims, according to the original Washington Mutual purchase agreement.

—Scott Thurm contributed to this article.

Es vergonzoso, hoy ha estado Susman y no ha abierto la boca, por no decir no ha dicho nada, igual hubuese dado que enviara a sus estudiantes de derecho. Sin embargo los abogados de las preferentes bien que han metido una mocion para presionar, ya solo nos queda que firmen el POR todos los implicados y hundan las acciones, un ultraje aberrante a los accionistas y al publico en general porque la calle sabe lo que se cueze pero a esta colla de desalmados les da igual. La juez tan tranquila sabiendo que no dan informacion al EC, no comprendo el estado de derecho en EEUU, verguenza supina y un latrocinio.