Re: El post del usuario de Ihub
...regarding the "it is over" comment.
I thought that context of that discussion, by the shareholder who spoke with Susman, was talking at that time of the McMahon 'discovery' that he was leaving. And the 'it is over' was in relation to McMahon was leaving -- as in "let this drop, it's a done deal".
At that time, it was highly doubted that Susman would have breached the confidentially with a shareholder about the case itself, something as big as is being inferred, IMHO erroneously, as 'it is over' = case is over.
To breach that confidentiality, by a lawyer the stature of Susman, is unfathomable to me.
Occam's Razor - the context, IMHO, was about McMahon leaving, and the comment relates to that.