DelShareholder Ilene Slatko
Debtor then proposed another settlement in April...Gropper getting a bit hung up on his knowledge/testimony
Parker: you said this proposal was not important, is that right? And your attorney, and then you, were on the phone protesting it?
----------------------------------------------
Just showed that he lied in knowing. Said he did not know about the settlement Proposals.
March 19 email by Mr.Rosen to Aurilus and you were on the phone next day to object it. \
April 29 email . You had found out that debtors made another purposal to JPM. Please note that the above holding a blocking position.
You did not agree and would have protested. You made it clear to debtors that you wanted to be part of the settlement and they were not consulted. Yes and that was correct.
You would not have objected if the debtors had increased the offers. He does not recall.