Re: Realidades de WMIH a día de hoy
Buscar una operación de fusión/adquisición mediante la ampliación de capital via preferentes y que los NOL´s jueguen un papel muy importante.
Algo que necesita unos meses más para que todo encaje.
Buscar una operación de fusión/adquisición mediante la ampliación de capital via preferentes y que los NOL´s jueguen un papel muy importante.
Algo que necesita unos meses más para que todo encaje.
Si se amplia capital las acciones actuales se diluirian. Los NOL solo pueden ser absorvidos por grandes beneficios y ni los hay ni se les espera.
Eres un memo Simpson, tu si que encajas en las memeces que dices, pero no contestar a antiguos pillados por tu culpa a eso les ignoras porque no tienes respuesta para ellos, llamese ten Shin o el nuevo que posteó recientemente.
El BOD ya ha dicho que van a buscar la mejor formula para diluir lo menos posible.
Si con saludarte a ti ya tengo suficiente..Bellezza te envia saludos jajajajaja
Belleza nos la presentas cuando vaya con Ten Shin a verte
Hecho.
They never had a case in the first place, with FDIC arguing as a Golden parachute payout, I think it is Over for employees.
JMW don't want to do anything here, with the District court ruling against the Employees, Walrath need not take the pain of going thru the Employee Claims any more.
It is sad for genuine employees who are not part of the mischievous gang like Rotella, but what to do, it affects everyone.
Don't know when the hearing is scheduled at the District court, however it is all over for employees. Can Hosen still settle for 1-2% and wait for FDIC to give a go ahead?
I expect a full payout by Feb 1, 2014 for my Piers.
http://www.hirschwest.com/golden-parachute-severances-violations-federal-deposit-insurance-act/
A recent United States Court of Appeals opinion reiterates that the FDIC can trump the right to enforce a contract as it applies to a “golden parachute” severance package. See, Martinez v. Rocky Mountain Bank, –Fed.Appx.–, No. 11-8076, 2013 WL 5498121 (10TH Cir. Oct. 4, 2013).
11494 Notice of Withdrawal of Motion by WMI Liquidating Trust for an Order Authorizing an Examination of Goldman Sachs Pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 2004 [Docket No. 10869] 470 k
http://www.kccllc.net/wamu/document/0812229131203000000000001
y...
marymbobh: It *could* mean a settlement or it could mean that the WMILT decided to abandon that action for unknown reasons. The settlement route looks more likely than an outright abandonment since the date for the hearing on the motion for examination of GS has been repeatedly postponed for short periods of time at the request of GS which suggests that negotiations were in progress. A settlement of some sort, though, does not necessarily mean that money from GS will rain down. It might mean only that GS will play ball with the WMILT against some other target or that GS will initiate some sort of action against someone else or something like that. We should find out more in a few days.
Esta mas claro que el agua, se han vendido a GS por 4 chavos, ya se dijo con anterioridad como actuarian esa pandilla de corruptos