WMILT: Comentarios de foreros USA
FWIW, Our old friend Mordicai is posting over on IHUB that he's not so sure that we're out of luck regarding GS, though I'm not sure if he is aware of the post by El Juez or if he even knows who El Juez and his significance here.
"The other reason could be maybe GS has an investment banker role in raising capital for the reorganized company, has a merger candidate lined up etc and are taking reduced fees as their compensation for the deal as a quid pro quo to end any short selling cause of action against them by the trust. As originally intended we we're suppose to be locked up in trading both the trust interests and our shares in the new company. So those who have sold their shares and would get screwed because of no direct benefit to the trust by such an arrangement would not have a viable cause of action against the trustees IMHO because their damages were caused by their action of selling the stock they were not suppose to trade. IMHO. Also since the withdrawal motion makes no mention otherwise, the motion is without prejudice under federal rules and could be refilled again. Also just because the trust filed a motion to expedite discovery in the bankruptcy case does not mean the trust ever intended to actually sue there as opposed to a federal circuit or state court. Gs even argued the bankruptcy court had no power to grant the discovery. Why even litigate this issue when you can just file in a different and perhaps more favorable forum. Hopefully we have reached some type of settlement. Glta"
- Mordicai, via Ihub, posted today.