Washington Mutual demanda a la FDIC por 17 billones US$ + daños

La que está liando Obama!!!!!

Mañana que tiemble el IBEX

Algunos de aqui vendieron Wamu para pasarse a BAC pues vaya.
Anda Simpson compra unas BAC y luego cuando bajen a 2 centimos montas otro hilo pidiendo justicia Jajaja

No ha sido ese mi caso... yo ya estoy FULL :)
El unico hilo que voy a coger es el de la pesca cuando me vaya a por unos buenos Marlins en Florida

Bueno eso si suena la flauta, pon mientras tanto unos vuenos velones coloreados a San Rafael hasta que la Juez saque el martillo pilón. Jajaja

http://www.kccllc.net/documents/0812229/0812229110808000000000008.pdf

Page 3/15: What debtors/SNHs and JPM are so afraid of:

"In this testimony, pages 176:21-179:3, Mr. Epes recountrs background facts concerning the negotiations that led to the GSA, including identifying the parties who were involved and when certain tax issues first arose."

And I love how the EC attys ....call the AOC/SNHs out on their continued lying/deceptive methods being used in the court process as EC cites factual and truthful events/testimony to the court..... This has to be hitting home with THJMW...

thanks spot...great to read as we go into Wed Aug 10th....

There has been years of speculation, countless settlement predictions and thousands of loud mouth penny fools come and go but one thing that has stayed consistent and true is the 'long fight' all who made it to this point from pre seizure have endured.

Three years ago it was JPM that gave the FDIC poor advice about the financial condition of Washington Mutual. JPM should have never been privy to communication or consultation with the FDIC since it was a bidding party.

JPM allegedly engaged in other questionable activities that ultimately contributed to the demise of the 115 year old Nations Largest Thrift Bank, and now Anico and Stern decisions support investigating those allegations.

The bankruptcy court heard testimony about IT allegations from SNH's who already made two attempts at sweeping the dirt under the table, but both offers were quickly rejected.

Brian Rosen's three years of work on behalf of WM is now in question since it was he that wrote the POR for the GSA that excluded key valuation he was aware should have been included in the valuation that would make A>L.

What is fair and reasonable seems pretty clear to all sincere longs who endured the hardships of the case, and suffered through the roller coaster of events leading up to the judges final report due post Oral Summaries.

My sincere view is longs will be in the money, and earn control of NEWCO, there simply is too much evidence on valuation of NOL's, cash, assets, and most relevant damages which will be paid for releasing the defense after the judge denies confirming the POR.

This may happen in stages, but the first stage of will occur after the judge issues a denial in my opinion.

¿Alguien cerro su posición? Corto.
¿algun margin call?

0.71 8094 15:59:47
0.71 6199 15:59:46
0.75 5000 15:59:41
0.75 8000 15:58:44
0.75 871 15:58:38
0.745 2500 15:58:29
0.75 2500 15:58:29
0.75 10000 15:58:24
0.75 10000 15:58:22
0.745 200 15:58:05
0.76 2500 15:57:29
0.768 150 15:57:23
0.76 13200 15:57:20
0.761 200 15:55:31
0.78 3781 15:55:07
0.7805 2500 15:54:52
0.785 1000 15:53:36
0.80 2500 15:51:30

Alguien con informacion adelantada que sale por piernas................