Acceder

Washington Mutual demanda a la FDIC por 17 billones US$ + daños

26,5K respuestas
Washington Mutual demanda a la FDIC por 17 billones US$ + daños
3 suscriptores
Washington Mutual demanda a la FDIC por 17 billones US$ + daños
Página
2.965 / 3.346
#23713

Re: El foro de luto

En otro hilo dicen que es una broma de mal gusto de Pptrueno pero yo he enviado un privado a Besugo para preguntarle y no he recibido respuesta.
Desde Julio no escribe nada. Besugo llevaba WAHUQ que al final no convirtieron y están en el tramo 5 en línea de cobro.

#23714

Re: El foro de luto

Despues de leer otros post de pptrueno, la verdad creo se puede tratar de una broma inclasificable, espero sea asi por el bien de Besugo

#23715

Re: El foro de luto

Hello people! :)

#23716

H E L L O

HELLO!

#23717

Bienvenido de vuelta Maximunae...

Ya solo falta nuestro amigo Besugo...pero no postea desde Julio :(

#23718

Re: Bienvenido de vuelta Maximunae...

No se que decir, pero si es una broma, la verdad es que no es de buen gusto. De todas formas, conciendole como ha sido su participación en el foro ya habría contestado casi con toda seguridad.
Simpson, tu crees entonces que las wahuq cobraran pronto? Yo compre gracias a las recomendaciones de Besugo, a como podrían llegarse a pagar?
Saludos a todos

#23719

WAHUQ

Satinfotec: Se que el día 19 hay un pago programado pero no se si llegará.
Puse un grafico la semana pasada con los tramos de como estan divididos y WAHUQ está el 5.

Yo no llevo WAHUQ y estoy esperando con mis Escrow de Preferentes que se resuelvan los misterios que rodean a WMIH.

Confio en que nos esperan buenas noticias... Saludos

#23720

Hearing 14 Noviembre

The minutes (http://www.kccllc.net/documents/0812229/0812229121114000000000002.pdf):

Proceedings:

Agenda Matters:
Items 1 through 24 - Continued or Resolved
Item 25 - Order entered
Item 26 - Settled, Stip due under Certification of Counsel
Item 27 - Order due under Certification of Counsel

Well, we got to hear the arguments and ruling for Item 27, so we don't need to see the order for that one. That will come later and the motion was denied. The judge ruled against Mr. Struck's motion to reinstate the employee claim. There were others that filed motions to have their claims reinstated, the argument being that for whatever reason or excuse, they did not file a response before. Filing a response would have kept their claims open and not get disallowed, for now at least.

As for Item 25, that was for the European holder of Trust Preferred Securities that submitted a release, but there were some problems and she did not end up with any WMIH shares.
An order did show up on KCCLC (http://www.kccllc.net/documents/0812229/0812229121114000000000003.pdf) and the claim was disallowed, but we don't know under what circumstances.

Item 26, this was also an employee asking for the claim to be reinstated. The minutes says it was settled, but can't be sure what that means exactly. I wonder if they just agreed to allow the claim back or if they agreed on something else. Actually, I looked at the claim in the Omnibus and the LT was not objecting to a portion of her claim for about $60k. There will be a stipulation filed later so we'll see the details.