Acceder

Washington Mutual demanda a la FDIC por 17 billones US$ + daños

26,5K respuestas
Washington Mutual demanda a la FDIC por 17 billones US$ + daños
3 suscriptores
Washington Mutual demanda a la FDIC por 17 billones US$ + daños
Página
3.074 / 3.346
#24585

Re: GS extendida al 11 Diciembre.

Los NOL´s iran a parar a WMIH a partir marzo 2014

GS irá a parar a los Escrows junto con algun otro regalito.

WAHUQ continua esperando liberación de $$$$$$$$

Seguimos adelante le pese a quien le pese... :) :) :)

#24588

Re: JPM en la cuerda floja... $11 Billones :) :) :) :) fueron robados $300 Billones a WAMU así que vayan devolviendo

Vale Simpson, te vas a forrar

#24589

Re: JPM en la cuerda floja... $11 Billones :) :) :) :) fueron robados $300 Billones a WAMU así que vayan devolviendo

Yo solo necesito ver un poquito de mano dura con uno de los principales causantes de la crisis. Que se lo funda Obama si puede. No te lo vas a creer pero estoy muy tranquilo frente a mi apuesta largoplacista... ya veremos como se desarrollan los proximos meses.

A mi ahora mismo solo me importa lo siguiente:

1. Finalizar los claims
2. Goldman Sachs y su unidad de reaseguros
3. NOL´s de $5.97 Billones que pueden empezar a salir a relucir tras Marzo 2014

#24590

WMIH: WMI HOLDINGS CORP. Files SEC form 8-K, Regulation FD Disclosure, Financial

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/933136/000119312513396702/0001193125-13-396702-index.htm

FORM 8-K

CURRENT REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Date of report (Date of earliest event reported): October 10, 2013


WMI Holdings Corp.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/933136/000119312513396702/d609637d8k.htm

WM MORTGAGE REINSURANCE COMPANY, INC.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET
AS OF AUGUST 31, 2013

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/933136/000119312513396702/d609637dex991.htm

#24592

Goldman Sachs y sus conflictos de interes

http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/10/10/bank-examiner-was-told-to-back-off-goldman-suit-says/?nl=business&emc=edit_dlbkpm_20131010

Espero que Ms Segarra tenga una conversación larga con Susman & WMILT.

Cada que son más las voces en USA que piensan que algo se está cociendo respecto a GS

If I (GS)was facing a settlement with someone with a smoking gun (WMILT), could I (GS) propose the following to WMILT because the people who would be getting paid are virtually the same people? I would propose a small cash settlement with the WMILT with my right hand, with no admission of guilt and save some face. PLUS to sweeten the settlement deal to WMILT and virtually the same benefactors, offer what I have in my left hand, a viable business model to WMIH. This would of course, have to be completely secret and would not be above board, but both the creditors in the waterfall and perhaps even our escrow shares depending on the cash amount to WMILT, would benefit PLUS certainly, the increased PPS of WMIH could benefit the holders of the converted WAMUQ shares (WMIH), who also own escrow shares. A lot of those creditors, escrow holders and converted shares (WMIH) are the same people. I know the entites of WMILT and WMIH are (should be) completely separate, but as we have learned, what should be is not necessarily what is reality. I also know that there are plenty who would not benefit, but who are they really?
I hope I have done a better job of explaining the sweet bridge deal that some entity like GS could use to settle.

That leads to another question. Timing. Do they have to happen at the same time or can one happen before the other. I would prefer the left hand to WMIH now and the right hand to WMILT after they settle with certain claimants.

Te puede interesar...
  1. Primeras dudas sobre la 'Trumponomics', ¿corrección o toma de beneficios?
  2. Nvidia bate expectativas pero decepciona. Insiders reafirman su posición