Washington Mutual demanda a la FDIC por 17 billones US$ + daños

1. Incorporación a Delaware (Fecha límite 19 marzo)
2. Listing en NYSE o NASDAQ
3. Capitalización
4. M & A

Esto se va a poner caliente Mr Simpson........

The filing also included text of substantial restriction on transfer of shares pursuant to Articles etc...

Why would any of this be required if there was no immediate expectation of publicly trading of shares?

Furthermore, "This Registration Statement registers under Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, " http://www.sec.gov/about/laws/sea34.pdf .....
"NECESSITY FOR REGULATION AS PROVIDED IN THIS TITLE
SEC. 2. For the reasons hereinafter enumerated, transactions
in securities as commonly conducted upon securities exchanges and
over-the-counter markets are effected with a national public interest
which makes it necessary to provide for regulation and control
of such transactions and of practices and matters related thereto,
including transactions by officers, directors, and principal security
holders, to require appropriate reports," etc...etc....

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/933136/000090951812000116/mm03-1812_8a12g.htm

If there was truly to be a blackout period... why was it necessary to register the company's stock with the SEC on March 19th, 2012??

http://www.kccllc.net/documents/0812229/0812229130219000000000001.pdf

Including:

9. Motion by WMI Liquidating Trust for an Order Authorizing an Examination of
Goldman Sachs Pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 2004 [Docket No. 10869; filed
11/30/12]

Objection Deadline: December 20, 2012 at 4:00 p.m. (EST);
Extended to February 13, 2013 at 4:00 p.m. (EST)

Objections/Responses Received: None to date.

Related Documents:

Status: The hearing regarding this matter is continued to a date to de determined.

Tic Tac

Besugo has recibido ya tu distribución de WAHUQ?
Pago total 10 USD! Mejor suerte para Mayo

10 dolares por todo el paquete?

Edgar Sargent pursues GS Naked Shorting discovery with GS out of the court ... where he knew he'd get nothing. This isn't his first rodeo and he knows who he his dealing with!! He took that course to show the court ... "he tried". It's all legal machination to follow through all the necessary steps before he moves on to the next step. Just as is the filing they did in the BK court. Most likely that filing and notification to GS that we are going to pursue this perhas made GS respond with a "let's talk".

Otherwise ... WHY would Edgar/Susman Team slow the movement of discovery down?? LT Legal fund has nearly $20MM (with more if needed) ... do you think he's watching the legal meter?? Doubtful. I doubt he cares if GS responds or not ... all Edgar/Susman want to do is move on to discovery or offer me something so I don't get to see what you got.

Personally, I would be just fine if this moved to another court after the way JPM and Rosen skirted around turning over discovery in the BK court and were never FORCED to do it. Remember when JPM told TPS and JMW that they couldn't find the records that listed the assets for the REITS?? That was the end of that!! There are other judges with a tougher view on these trading violations. So maybe GS is stuck if they file to move to another jurisdiction because they could get a tough judge like in the Raj IT cases or the other one where the Judge overruled on what the SEC settled on and handed down a tougher penalty.

I don't question Edgar/Susman's decisions to push this out. It's not that unusual and only they know what is going on to base those decisions on. One thing for sure, Edgar and team got indoctrinated by fire to the Wall St. crooks during this case.